Day 6 seemed to split in half. The first half of the day was brought to you by Jack Stamp and Eugene Corporon - with one notable exception - and the second half of the day belonged to Asia. The morning repertoire session was performed by the Keystone Wind Ensemble. I won't report here on the repertoire presented as much of that is covered in my blog entry for the WASBE web site. But I did find it interesting that, in some ways, Keystone is much like PSWE, they are essentially an alumni band of Indiana University of Pennsylvania and bring together outstanding players, some who are and some who aren't involved in music professionally. The significant difference is that Keystone is a recording ensemble and have only performed five live concerts in their history!
The other part of the Stamp/Corporon presentation was a session discussing the recording history and methods of the groups that they have jointly been involved in recording over the last twenty years. It was interesting for me to learn about how they record, how they finance and how they distribute their recordings. They also issued a sizeable document listing every CD that they have released and the repertoire contained on each.
The most provocative session of the week occurred between these two and was entitled The Problem with Band Repertoire in Music Education: or, First, Shoot all the Composers! This talk was given by a Washington Post journalist who published an article in 2005 bemoaning the lack of music being taught in schools. This was written from the standpoint of a band parent who's kids had survived a school music program to never play or show much interest in music at all after graduation. He blames the failure of the music education system in North America on the curriculum. The curriculum is so focussed on preparing for the next performance and trying to win the next competition, that the kids don't get to truly learn about music. The music that is selected as the core of the curriculum is designed to help make your band sound good rather than teach them about musical history, style and aesthetics. He blames the composers and the publishers for continuously spewing out formulaic crap that becomes the diet for music students. As one can imagine, there was a fair amount of debate that ensued, both in the actual session and in the halls and bars for the rest of conference. Both composer and publisher viewpoints were represented in the session itself as well as many conductors and music educators. A sensitive issue was exposed and, I suspect, will continue to generate discussion for some time to come.
The afternoon concert was presented by the China Youth Corps Band and I have to admit that the repertoire was so uninteresting to me that I left at intermission.
The evening concert was a pleasant surprise. I have to admit that I was not particularly looking forward to it given my experience with the programming of many of the Japanese bands that I have heard before but the Philharmonic Winds OSAKAN played some very interesting repertoire without falling into too many of the traps that many of their neighbouring bands do. I was particularly surprised by a work by Mark Camphouse entitled Anthem. Mr. Camphouse dealt with the Iraq war and the American involvement. He quoted both the Iraqi and American national anthems and I was afraid that this could turn out to be cliched, crass or obvious. This was far from the truth. The use of the American anthem was subtle and tasteful. If I knew the Iraqi anthem, I would be able to comment on it. It was an expressive and captivating work that will need to be listened to again, if not actually performed!
My time, right now is running out and I need to get ready to catch a plane to come home. I may finish this up in transit or tomorrow when I return. Now, stuff the suitcase and find my passport!